The new term going forward is likely to be Product Designer.

If you want to qualify it, you could say Digital Product Designer, but since nearly everything we make and buy in the future will have some sort of technology and code component, that is probably redundant.

I’ve renamed my team to the Product Design team and moved all their titles to product designers, and many other tech companies are now making that transition as well. The Facebook design team call themselves product designers, and many new startups and VCs are asking for product design. It’s a term that is better suited than UX, UI, UED, IA or IxD inside the corporate structure, and is a term that requires the designer to be focused and held accountable on the thing that they make: a product. It’s a term that also allows one to be multi-skilled or multi-faceted for their design work, so it creates a nice transition path for those whose skills may have been too siloed or walled off over the past decade. And yet the term is forgiving enough to not require those skills today while still being able to evolve as time moves on and people get better at this thing we call design.

It puts the designer on par with product managers as well for those in larger corporations, and while a lot of people say engineering or development, they really mean product engineering or product development, so it levels the playing field for designers in that context as well.

It allows business folks and recruiters to easily understand what you do while being broad enough to mean you can make something like software apps for desktop or mobile, design the Kinect, or build something like a robotic vacuum cleaner.

People get products, and in the end, product designers will be beholden to businesses in the same way that graphic designers are beholden to advertising. Our jobs exist to make money, and we exist in a corporate or capitalist environment. Otherwise we’d simply be artists.

See Questions On Quora

Steve Krug’s Don’t Make Me Think” (http://amzn.to/dOHEfI) and Donald Norman’s “The Design of Everyday Things” (http://amzn.to/ertWm7)  are the two best books to start with in my opinion. Both have reached ‘required reading’ status within the usability and UX fields.

See Questions On Quora

Enterprise is quite simply where great Interaction Design happens. Most junior level ux professionals, with the help of a couple decent pattern libraries, can crank out your average web 2.0 application in short order, look good, and never burn more than a few brain cells – it just isn’t that hard, and most are me-too applications anyway.

Enterprise is different. Enterprise apps, especially large scale, important, collaborative and conversational apps require a unique and deep understanding of user-centered design, design research, business domain expertise, contextual inquiry expertise, political prowess, business strategy expertise – all on top of basic design skills like problem space definition, exploration, abductive reasoning, prototyping and usability testing.

Some might say that consumer application ux design is where *it’s at* because the median iq/domain expertise for your average (is there such a thing?) user is considerably lower and therefore requires a stricter discipline to make things elegant, understandable, engaging, and persuasive (in the BJ Fogg sense of the word). I would say the assumption is false, and further it’s just as important in enterprise application design.

I don’t know if I accept your premise that enterprise is where designers tend to shy away – if this is true – it might simply be because it’s harder. Most of the problems involve really complex business rules, large amounts of corporate value resting on the success (as opposed to venture vending that cares a lot less, since they are simply looking for a 10x – 100x from 1 of the 15 companies they invested in within the exact same problem space.)

Am I biased? Not really – I spent years inside 2 large enterprises doing knowledge management (groupware) design and risk modeling software design. I also spent plenty of time designing consumer applications and experiences. Both worlds carry their own challenges and opportunities – but because most enterprise software is accomplishing complex business objectives instead of the “It’s twitter for ER Nurses” or “It’s Tungle.me for gangstas,” – and because many consumer apps are frankly easier – they will always attract the low-hanging ux designers looking for an easy job and the promise of fame, glory, drug addiction and hookers.

Okay – so back to the initial question. “How do you recruit great ux/ixd into an enterprise”

1. Focus on the design challenges and the opportunities to engage  in a number of different ux related activities, methods, and processes to hone their skills.
2. Differentiate Start-up life from Enterprise life: sometimes, start-ups are so lean, they have little to no budget to do the following:

• User research
• Mental Models
• Mood Maps
• Stakeholder Interviews
• Design Studios
• Sketching and Critique
• Iterative Prototyping
• Usability testing – both formal lab testing as well as remote.
• Analytics (also because, if they are launching a completely new thing, there are no analytics from which to glean insights to feed back into the design process).

Theoretically, enterprises should have the cash flow from operations to support all the various elements of human centered design as well as other important aspects like:
3. High probability that your check will clear;
4. Formal review process; well-designed career path with goal setting and “visioning your future” as well as moneys for education and training including attendance to relevant conferences. (This may have been curtailed during the recent economic downturn, but it actually provides an opportunity to treat career paths and learning as a unique problem requiring innovative solutions – so for instance internal book clubs across team functions. I recently joined one where people from a couple of different teams are coming together to collaboratively read and discuss behavioral economics, persuasive technology, and influence.
5. Start-ups are often stressful – they can be fun, energizing, amazing experiences, but they are also fraught with stress, anxiety, and long, long hours. Having worked on a number of start-ups, this is more the rule than exception. Clearly articulate the work-life balance to them to potential designers interested in an opportunity in your enterprise.
6. Opportunity to learn from top-notch talent that has been around the block a few times. Many start-ups barely have moneys for more than a single UX designer, and they are looking for that unicorn that can do solid ux, visual design, and front end coding because their budgets are tight. Enterprise organizations are more likely to have at least a few, if not an entire team of ux talent across some of the many sub-disciplines like user research, content strategy, seo, ia, ixd, and usability testing – these people will be on the team providing many learning opportunities to expand skill sets.

If your enterprise doesn’t have those things – you can always simply pay more. It’s a relatively free marketplace in the US meaning – sell all those great aspects of your company, and if you don’t have those things, pay 30% more than the going market rate for similarly skilled ux professional. Start-ups are cash lean, and intentionally offer lower than market salaries combined with options granted that are, for the most part, paper – and should be treated as such. The probability that your 100,000 shares at a $0.001/per or 0.05% of the company shares will ever be worth more than it’s equivalent weight in toilet paper is less than 1%.

Just my opinion. YMMV

See Questions On Quora

User Experience (UX) or Experience Design (XD) is the general term under which all types of design (visual, interaction, sound, industrial, etc.) fall. Even fields like architecture, writing, HCI, information architecture, ergonomics, and a host of others could all be considered UX, because they are all concerned with the overall impression a user has when engaging with a product.

Interaction design is the definition of how a product behaves in response to human behavior, as well as defining the means to manipulate the product (controls). In many cases, how the interaction design is manifest visually is via a user interface.

Visual designers create visual representation (the form) of the interaction design (and the associated content, if any) to create the UI. Not all products have a UI, although most have some sort of means of input and feedback that should be design.

Sometimes the roles of visual and interaction designer are done by the same person. This is very common in web design, for instance. On complex projects, it is hard to do both very well, although not impossible.

The lines between many of the disciplines can be blurry. For instance, you might use the tools of information architecture to create a site structure, but the tools of interaction design to define the navigation to get between the different areas.

In one sense, most people in the field are UX designers, because most people are concerned with the overall experience of the product. On the other hand, UX is a fairly generic term that doesn’t describe what someone specializes in and the types of problems they want to address. Many generalists seem to taking the term “UX Designer” while specialists are still calling themselves “visual designer” or “interaction designer.” (“Web Designer” is an unusual anomaly in that most web designers are also front-end developers.)

It is confusing, especially to outsiders and even to people inside the field. But the story isn’t that hard. Other fields, medicine being a prime example, have generalists and specialists. If we as a field could simply, clearly, present these distinctions, we’d all be better off.

See Questions On Quora