I am an industrial designer and have worked on cell phone. The camera sensor is usually the thickest component in the phone. In fact in the latest iterations of the iPhone, it sticks out by 1mm or so. This is because all of the other components are able to get thinner, except this one.

Now because it is so thick, it cannot be stacked on top of the battery which takes 90% or so of the surface of the phone. This leaves very few options: the top or the bottom. The bottom is out for obvious ergonomic reasons so that leaves the top. Now here is the thing: modern phones are PACKED with components. There is no room anywhere. This means that centering the camera would mean moving another large component and risking to have to grow the phone somewhere else.

The next explanation is an aesthetic one. If the designer decides to center the camera, then where is the flash going? To the left? to the right? Either way it will look unbalanced. The default position goes back to the upper left corner, just as in the previous 5 iterations of the phone.

Finally, moving the camera, beside detracting from the heritage, improve nothing and make the phone larger than needed would mean alienating millions of user who have been accustomed to this location over the past 10 years! As the saying goes, if it ain’t broke, don’t fix it…

See Questions On Quora

Hello prospective UXDi student! Unfortunately I don’t have a short answer for you. I do have a lot of information though if you’re seriously considering the program, so I hope you humor me a little.

Just to give you some context: I am a (pretty recent) graduate of the UXDi in NYC. The course is now 10 weeks instead of 8, and in those 2 weeks they’ve added 1 week of visual design and 1 week of front-end. Both are extremely basic.

Let me start by saying that GA markets itself as providing the skills to make you a minimum viable UX designer, and get you hired so that you can gain real experience. They don’t promise a dream job out of the gate, they don’t promise to make you a UX pro. They promise the basic set of skills, the opportunity to build up a portfolio to get you started, a hiring network, and the 93% chance of getting an industry job 3 months after graduating.

The Good News:

1) I received several competitive job offers within a month of graduating, didn’t have to apprentice/intern at all, and I’m fully employed as a user experience designer in what is pretty much my dream job. I work on a project I love every single day, and I’m not a ‘wireframe monkey’. I do extensive research and usability testing, steer project strategy, and also do wireframing and prototyping.

2) Unlike what others have said, I did not have a background in visual design OR coding. That being said, I am naturally interested in good design, and out of curiosity I have taken HTML/CSS and Javascript short courses on Codecademy, but am by no means fluent in any programming language. Before UXDi, I was in a completely unrelated field.

3) I was happy to find that my instructors are pretty awesome and experienced in the field, and that the curriculum is very thoughtful and genuinely did arm you with a great understanding of the user-centered design process. The projects they set up are fantastic and provided a great way for you to apply your newly-acquired knowledge, and the client project at the end of the course was extremely helpful for preparing us for real client work. I came out of there knowing how to use Sketch, Omnigraffle, Axure, and a variety of other tools that have continued to be immensely helpful in my short career. I really love how UXDi balances a very portfolio-oriented approach with theoretical knowledge.

4) UXDi is the strongest program they offer at GA. UX itself is a hugely growing market (there are many, many opportunities out there), and there aren’t that many UX bootcamp competitors (yet). UX designers have all sorts of origin-stories, and at the moment you do not need formal education to be a successful designer. (In contrast, WDi is competing with a really saturated bootcamp dev market, and GA does not offer a very competitive course. The Product Manager immersive that recently started has even bigger problems – ~2 out of 25 students, 2 months after graduation, are hired. That program needs a lot of work.)

The Bad News:

My experience seems to be unique. Many, many of my fellow classmates are still unemployed. The course offers many positives, but for now, let me name the negatives and let you weigh the experience for yourself.

1) Like many have said, the admissions team of GA seems to have one criteria in mind, and only one: have the money to pay for the course. That’s it. It sounds mean, but I have classmates that should not have been accepted into the program based on their lack of interest/realistic expectations alone. Some of them barely paid attention to the instructors throughout the course, or were deadweights on partner or group projects.  There should be actual standards in place for admission, or GA should have the guts to “fire” students who aren’t trying hard enough – thereby incentivizing students to keep motivated and keep competitive, and strengthening the GA brand.

2) Because of point #1, there are a lot of mediocre students who graduate and proceed to flood the entry-level market with very average portfolios and a poor grasp of UX, relying on nothing more than what GA has taught them to get a job. All of these things really stain GA’s reputation. Things my classmates and I have heard through the hiring process: that GA grads are everywhere and aren’t impressive, and that while GA grads have a “good UX toolkit”, they often lack the insights / maturity to know when to use individual tools.

3) The quality of your education is largely dependent on how good your instructor is. I’ve definitely heard a few instructor horror stories. I was lucky to have a few good ones, but it could have easily gone the other way.

4) The much-toted “93% hire rate” is certainly not true for my class. A few have been hired, some for even fantastic companies, but most of them have been struggling to get even internships or (genuine UX) freelance projects. Some have just gone back to their old companies with an added UX skillset. In the same vein, the  Apprenticeship Program is often spoken about as a lovely safety net, but during our course, no one would answer any questions about it. We were told that “errmmm… while it is an option, you first have to find companies willing to hire you but that have admitted they don’t have the money to do so, and then they have to contact us, and then there will be a discussion, and yeah, I think that’s how it goes. But don’t depend on it.” Kudos to other classes that have been able to avail of this program, but for now, it seems to be a fairytale for us.

5) Post-course, you’re basically on your own. The outcomes program is pretty much a joke. As mentioned in previous posts, the much-heralded Meet-and-Greet is poorly-attended. The best companies already ask GA about their best students, and contact them separately. If you think that you’ll meet your future company at their organized hiring event, you are very sadly mistaken. Instructors who were your best friends during the course are too busy planning their next course and/or working on their own side projects to help you in any meaningful way.

6) Lastly, GA seems to be intent on reckless and exponential expansion. UXDi has 2 classes, and WDi has 4 classes, each semester. This doesn’t take into account the other part-time courses. Combined with lack of admissions standards, the graduation rate only appears to make things increasingly hard for each graduating batch.

—

I’ve thought long and hard for a couple of months about tips I can give you to make sure you aren’t just quitting your job and wasting $9,500, and this is it:

1) Test your passion for the field. UX sounds great, I agree, and everyone is attracted to [their perception of] “the startup / tech life”. That doesn’t mean that UX is for you, and the best way to figure out if it is, is to put in the work up-front. It’s good that you’re already on Quora, but read everything you can online about UX. There are touchstone books, medium posts by industry heavyweights, and constant meetups and talks. GA teaches you some of this stuff, of course, but what they do best is give you a holistic understanding – you still need to fill in a lot of the thought processes and heuristics yourself, so do it in advance. Live it, tweet about it, blog about it. Immerse yourself in the industry as much as you expect to in the course. Be interested. And, of course, don’t join UX if you’re only looking for a change and ‘don’t know where else to go’/because you heard that UX is the cool new thing to do/because you’ve heard UX has a low-barrier to entry/because you want to tell your friends you work for a cool start-up with a pingpong table.

2) Be willing to work your ass off. Be willing to learn anything, and everything. Not a visual designer? Take an online class on Photoshop. Volunteer to do wireframe design on your next project. Learn from a visual designer classmate. Don’t know any front-end? Do a few Codeacademy courses. They’re free. Plan a weekend HTML/CSS project and actually do it. During the course, learn from every project you do. See your classmate do something awesome in their project? Learn from it. Do it. Make it better. Being able to be a flexible and industrious is what will make you interesting to hiring companies. Why? Because the industry changes all the time. There are always new research, wireframing or prototyping tools and methods to use, and the best UX designers have the interest to learn them and keep learning.

3) Network. Like. HELL. The most amazing thing about the UX field is that is extremely flat and transparent. Go to the dozens of meet-ups happening at any given time. Make friends with designers, developers and PMs. Tweeting at UX titans will most likely get a response from them. Contact awesome UXers working out there and take them out to coffee, pick their brains – not because you want to weasel a job out of them, but because you believe that knowledge doesn’t come exclusively from books, so that every meeting is a learning opportunity, and because you understand that you can only get better.

In the end, UXDi gives you the steps of the user-centered design process and trains you on the current tools, but you’ll have to form a body of knowledge and a UX mindset all on your own to understand when to use a certain tool over another and when shifting your steps just might give you the most optimal outcome. In this case, a lot of your success weighs on you, and you alone. That is certainly not a bad thing, but it isn’t what GA promises. Understand that there may be odds stacked against you. But if you want it, if you’re passionate, then GA may very well be the place that changes your life. It did for me.

Andre Plaut and GA staff, if you’re reading this – Please, please, PLEASE reconsider how you’re running these immersive programs. If you keep expanding at the pace you are, without creating admission / graduation standards, you will do all the graduates and current students a huge disservice, and wasted all the effort you’ve put in to creating a great program.

See Questions On Quora

Unfortunately the answer is that many UX designers don’t do UX anymore.

User Experience Designing is the designing of the whole user experience, and the confusion happens when people confuse design with visual design. Design is a process that may have multiple outputs, many of which are non visual.

What a User Experience Designer should do is architect a solution through user research, workshops, team work and through using a diverse tool set of skills, such as information architecture and content strategy. They should know why the project does what it does and why it does it from a users perspective.

Traditionally, and for good reason, a good UXer will hand across a set of blueprints (wireframes etc) for implementation specialists to work from. Implementation specialists include developers (front and back) and visual designers.

Also UX does not mean just web! If a person is a UX designer who does not user research, goes straight to code and visual design and only works in web then they are not a UX designer but a Web Designer. 

In short – a lot of UX designers out there don’t do much UX.

See Questions On Quora

Along with those listed here, I’ve included several more you should take some time to explore.

1. Learn the fundamentals

Before doing anything, learn the basics. Get a solid foundation of knowledge to understand what user experience design is, and how UI design fits within it. Become familiar with the terminology, the theories and best practices. Learn how to put them to use. There are many parts to the overall UX design process, but understanding them all will make you a better designer.

Here’s a few online resources/articles I would recommend:

• The Hipper Element by Joel Marsh (UX Crash Course: 31 Fundamentals)
• Lynda.com (http://www.lynda.com/Web-User-Ex…)
• Team Treehouse Blog (http://blog.teamtreehouse.com/10…)
• Smashing Magazine (http://www.smashingmagazine.com/…)

2. Get to know the tools

As a UX/UI designer, you will most likely use a variety of tools throughout your career. Learn as much as you can about them so you can execute on deliverables as a UI/UX designer. From wireframing to mockups to prototypes, you will need to understand how to complete a variety of items which requires several different tools.

• Wireframing Tools
• Balsamiq: http://support.balsamiq.com/cust…
• Omnigraffle: https://www.omnigroup.com/video/…
• Illustrator: 10 Tips for Building Wireframes With Illustrator – Tuts+ Design & Illustration Article
• UXPin: http://blog.uxpin.com/category/t…
• UI Design Tools
• Sketch: Learn iOS design and Xcode
• Photoshop: https://www.google.com/webhp?sou…

3. Find a mentor

The best advice I received when beginning my career was to find someone who’s great at doing what I wanted to do. Find a mentor. Find someone who’s got the experience and is willing to share it with you. Network with other designers to talk to and learn from. You can read a blog I posted about the importance of finding a mentor (https://medium.com/@joeykirk/you…).

This will be a person you’ll rely on throughout your career for advice, critiques and help. So choose carefully. If you are serious about learning and becoming a designer, I’d recommend our program at Bloc (Learn Web Design with a Mentor | Bloc). We do one-on-one mentorship with experienced professionals who will help you become a better designer.

4. Hone your craft

The best way to learn is to put your knowledge and skills to action, and continue learning. Learn by doing. Find a project and begin working on it. Once you complete that one, find another and build it. Build something for yourself. Build something for a friend. Build something for fun. Build something just to build something.

Disclaimer: I am the UX Design Director at Bloc (http://www.bloc.io), where we offer one-on-one mentorship for people wanting to learn how to develop for the web, create mobile applications or become a designer.

See Questions On Quora

Carousels are very ineffective at showcasing website content. As part of a contract in which I’m helping to redesign a company’s website, I researched the effectiveness of carousels and found a plethora of research showing carousels (1) result in visitors missing the site’s messages and (2) make sites harder to use. Below, I’ve detailed the specific findings that back these claims up and included sources for the related research/studies.

(1) Visitors miss your messages:

• Research shows that users miss messages in moving carousels — not only the hidden 2nd, 3rd, 4th messages, but also very first message.In this study, a user missed the main message (which was in huge font in the center of the homepage) because it was in a moving carousel. [source]
• “Banner Blindness” – users can ignore messages in carousels because they can look like an ad when highly styled or moving. [source] [source 2]
• Studies show that users don’t click on carousels. In this study, around 1% of homepage visitors clicked on the carousel at all; of those who did click, 89% clicked the first image, meaning that they missed seeing the following images. [source]
• With one message highlighted at a time, relevant content can be hidden under a stack of carousel images and users may never see them. For example, if you have 4 carousel slides targeting the 4 customer segments, the homepage will alienate a large portion of users when they first land on the site. If a Bank comes to the site, there is a 25% chance of the carousel being targeted to them; if the first image they see is targeted to MNO’s, they’ll look away to the carousel to find information relevant to them, rather than waiting for content in the carousel to speak to them.

(2) Visitors find sites with carousels less easy-to-use:

• An eye tracking study testing 3 types of carousels showed that users found them distracting (4 on a 1-5 scale). [source]

• A carousel could decrease homepage load time if the images are high-quality (1 high-quality image is faster to load than 4).
• Moving UI elements can pose problems for international users as well as accessibility (screen readers and users with mobility issues). Slow-reading users can also get annoyed because when a carousel moves automatically, users lose control over the UI and their own reading experience. [source]

Related resources:

• On UX Stack Exchange: Are carousels effective?
• On UX Stack Exchange: Using a carousel on home page or not?
• On UX Stack Exchange: Are carousels effective on non-Ecommerce sites?
• Blogpost: “Carousel Interaction Stats“
• Blogpost: “Don’t Use Automatic Image Sliders or Carousels, Ignore the Fad“
• Sarcastic website: Should I Use A Carousel?

See Questions On Quora